Animal testing the animal rights debate

Below, I will outline one of the more common arguments used to reach this conclusion. What if I sprayed bleach in your eyes? To stop animal research would also be unethical as it would dramatically affect the development of new knowledge and flow of treatments to those with health conditions who desperately need them.

Amphibians and fish may be immersed in water containing an anesthetic such as tricaine. Whatever benefits animal experimentation is thought to hold in store for us, those very same benefits could be obtained through experimenting on humans instead of animals. It includes pure research such as genetics, developmental biology, behavioural studies, as well as applied research such as biomedical research, xenotransplantation, drug testing and toxicology tests, including cosmetics testing.

The proposals have three aims: John P Gluck has suggested that this is often lacking: Justifying animal experiments Those in favour of animal experiments say that the good done to human beings outweighs the harm done to animals.

Providing high quality, disease-free environments for the animals will help ensure that every animal counts. This philosophical essay briefly presents his views. Yes Scientists have been able to advance their knowledge of human and animal health and disease dramatically by studying model organisms.

Someone can easily hurt anyone just like a animal. They are crucial for allowing scientists to learn more about human biology and health, and for developing new medicines. Which of those drugs should we give to some healthy young human volunteers as the first dose to humans all other things being equal?

Although sometimes these studies do reduce the quality of life of these animals, thorough regulations are in place to ensure that they are carried out in a humane way.

Should animals be used in research?

They may not be able to tell you this, but they have feelings to you know!? Do you think it is wrong to eat animals? Yes The use of animals in research is essential for enabling researchers to develop new drugs and treatments.

Cohen, Andrew and Wellman, Christopher eds. Read it please Ban it now! On the other hand, removing animals completely from the lab would impede our understanding of health and disease, and consequently affect the development of new and vital treatments.

With that in mind, the argument runs, it is best practice to act charitably and treat all humans as part of the moral community. Captive bolts may be used, typically on dogs, ruminants, horses, pigs and rabbits. What is relevant is the ethical approach of the experimenter to each experiment.

Some physical methods are only acceptable after the animal is unconscious. Whenever possible painkillers and anaesthetics are used to manage painin the same way it is when an animal visits a vet.

Fourteen states explicitly prohibit the practice, while the remainder either allow it or have no relevant legislation.

Animal testing

What do you think about people who wear fur coats? However, we look upon past examples of this behavior as morally condemnable. Electrocution may be used for cattle, sheep, swine, foxes, and mink after the animals are unconscious, often by a prior electrical stun.

Proposed EU directive Proposed EU directive In November the European Union put forward proposals to revise the directive for the protection of animals used in scientific experiments in line with the three R principle of replacing, reducing and refining the use of animals in experiments.

Department of Agriculturethere were 71, monkeys in U. In the United States and China, most primates are domestically purpose-bred, whereas in Europe the majority are imported purpose-bred. Keeping dogs tied to a post all day.

Experimenting on animals

On the one hand it is considered morally wrong to use animals in this way solely for human benefit. Below you can find many of the arguments being made for and against the use of animals in the laboratory, some you are probably already aware of and some you may not have thought about… what do you think?Is Animal Testing Justified?

Essay. Introduction Whether animal experimentation is justified or not has been undecided for many decades. Many years back, the debate was carried out by animal rights groups which were led by the Cambridge University to get rid of its plan for a primate research in Currently animal testing is a compulsory, legal part of drug testing.

Animal studies are always used alongside other types of research such as cell cultures, computer modelling and human clinical trials. Animal testing or animal research is the use of non-human animals in scientific experimentation.

Debate: Animal testing

It is estimated that 50 to million vertebrate animals worldwide — from zebrafish to non-human primates — are used annually. Auto Suggestions are available once you type at least 3 letters. Use up arrow (for mozilla firefox browser alt+up arrow) and down arrow (for mozilla firefox browser alt+down arrow) to review and enter to select.

An important part of the debate over animal rights centers on the question of the moral status of an animal. Most people agree that animals have at least some moral status – that is why it is wrong to abuse pets or needlessly hurt other animals.

Dec 08,  · Animal rights extremists often portray those who experiment on animals as being so cruel as to have forfeited any own moral standing. But the argument is about whether the experiments are morally.

Animal testing the animal rights debate
Rated 5/5 based on 64 review